Wednesday, June 8, 2016
Card show changes, Pt. 1: A dime box etiquette rant
I attended a card show at the big local convention center a few Saturdays ago.
While I still came out with my usual bag full o' finds, the show was, for quite a few reasons, a strange and disconcerting experience. I'll probably go into further details in the later posts in this series, but for now I'll just say that it pretty much embodied every reason why I'm more drawn to low-key, hotel-type card shows rather than these sometimes overwhelming convention-hall gatherings.
No single table confirmed that more than a dime box vendor I stumbled upon a couple aisles in. In terms of both quantity and quality, it was a haul for the ages, and every single card you'll see in this post came from those boxes.
But at the risk of getting on my soapbox and sounding too preachy, both the vendors and the customers who were digging alongside me at this table also embodied almost everything you should NOT do when trying to provide a comfortable card show experience.
There were so many violations of your basic dime box etiquette that I almost don't even know where to start.
1) The table was run by a father-son duo, and from the moment I arrived at the boxes to the moment I left about 45 minutes later, the son was standing literally about two feet away from me for reasons still unknown.
I'm a big believer in personal space, and it made me uncomfortable knowing the kid's eyes were on me (he was right around my age) nearly the entire time I was at the table.
2) Every time I would start to accumulate a new stack of cards I wanted to buy, the kid would step in my way and begin counting them for me.
I don't mind if vendors want to total up my purchases for me. It actually helps since my piles tend to be quite messy (ask my dad about that) and it keeps me from having to take several minutes to count everything at the end of my dig.
But what angered me about this particular experience was that the kid did, in fact, physically step in front of me to count what I had, to the point where I had to reach over him to look through a new stack of cards.
Again, you'd think something like this would be common sense...but apparently not.
3) The kid also repeatedly crouched inches away from me -- even kind of nudging me at one point and stepping on my foot -- to reach for boxes he had stored underneath the table.
Not even a single Excuse Me.
4) On a couple of occasions, the kid pushed past me to put new stacks of cards in the dime boxes.
I'd normally be excited about the prospect of more dime cards to look through, but most of the open spots the kid chose to insert said new cards were spots I'd purposefully left bare within the rows to keep my place.
Since the table consisted of about a dozen 3200-count boxes, it often wasn't easy to remember where I'd left off.
5) Perhaps it's the cynic in me, but part of me sometimes believes that people, like dogs, should be required to have some kind of basic How To Act in Public 101 training when it comes to large gatherings.
The kid took about three or four phone calls while I was at the table, and, like I said earlier, he was standing two feet away from me the whole time.
I became well-versed in his Ebay tales, how this card sold and this one didn't sell and how he was thinking about giving this one guy bad feedback and how he couldn't make it to the party later.
6) Also present was the classic vendor move: trying to sell me stuff, over and over again.
No, I don't want this 3200-count box of basketball cards for thirty bucks, and no, I don't want that Griffey jersey card because you see I just decided to buy a card of his.
7) But it wasn't just the vendors.
On a few different occasions, customers came up to the table, reached across my body, shuffled through some cards (again, causing me to lose my place), fingered through a stack inches away from me that anyone could see was quite obviously my purchase pile, and left without a word.
You don't have to be a dime box rookie to know not to do that.
8) If you see someone else digging through dime boxes when you arrive, you should, at the very least, ask them where they are and then start looking through the cards that they've already gone through.
I employed this proper dime box etiquette at a table earlier on in the day, quietly inquiring where the guy was in his dig. He pointed out the cards he'd already sifted through and vehemently thanked me for asking. He even, at one point, said to me, Seems like no one here has ever been to a card show before since I guess he'd already dealt with a few of the issues I'd come to experience a few tables later.
Not one of the customers that approached the table during this massive dig employed that same common courtesy.
9) After the dust had settled nearly 45 minutes later, I wound up with 474 dime cards and a mild headache.
About 95 percent of dime box vendors I've come across in the past will offer some kind of discount if you spend a good amount of time and money at their table, somewhere around 20-30 percent off. I don't mean to sound cheap or anything, but I thought a volume discount in this case would've been appropriate for my 474 cards...say, 40 bucks for the lot.
That's 47 dollars, said the kid. Guess not. Though I guess I did get four cards free, technically.
Yippee.
I worry that I sound petty or whiny when it comes to these simple rules of dime box etiquette, but that's exactly the reason why I felt the need to write an entire post about something like this.
I don't think I'm asking for much when I say that you don't have to be watching over my shoulder for 45 minutes straight or getting in my way when I'm trying to BUY YOUR CARDS or the basic fact that you should, both literally and figuratively, not step on people's toes whilst going through a dime box. I'm not asking for much here.
These rules are SIMPLE, and, for the most part, just basic common sense.
Despite all these little frustrations and head-shakers, I guess what I'm really trying to say here is that, in the end, the cards themselves are what matter most.
Yes, it would be nice if people could abide by these simple guidelines and, doggone it, just be polite.
But am I willing to brave one of these extended I'm-kind-of-losing-faith-in-humanity moments if it means adding 474 gem-filled dime box finds to my collection?
You bet I am.
Especially cards that feature a selection of tough late '90s cards from sets like Ultra and Fleer Tradition and Sports Illustrated that this father-son duo had by the bucketload in their dime boxes.
The experience was far from ideal, but I still walked away from that table feeling nothing short of triumphant.
Perhaps the best of the lot was this spectacular "Video Replay" Stadium Club insert of Kerry Wood's 20th strikeout during that fateful afternoon against the Astros in 1998.
It doesn't show in the scan, but if you tilt this card back and forth, you get to see something like a TV replay of that last breaker to Derek Bell, a pitch that still has the most action of any single pitch I've ever seen in my years of watching baseball.
It's things like this that I've hoped to convey through this blog. Digging through dime boxes does take some time and effort, and yes, you might run into some less-than-ideal experiences from time to time like this one. But I'll be darned if anything beats that feeling at the end of the haul, the feeling when you know you've just bolstered your collection by exponential leaps and bounds.
In the end, the cards rule all, and always will.
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
2016 Topps Archives: Hitting its stride
There have been many times over the past few months where I've felt something like a physical need to buy a pack of baseball cards.
Since I've captured most of my needs from Flagship, Opening Day, and Heritage by now, much of my pack therapy has come in the form of Gypsy Queen (ugh) and even occasionally Donruss (double ugh). The sheer pleasure of cracking open those wrappers helped, though the cards themselves didn't necessarily deliver.
This is one reason I've been looking forward to the dawn of Archives more than usual this year. When I heard rumblings of the set hitting retail shelves earlier last week, I immediately took a stroll down to my local Target. I came up empty the first time, but, on the following day's trip, I found gobs and gobs of it on the pegs and along the wall.
Though it was more than I normally like to spend on retail, I splurged on a blaster and a trio of rack packs of 2016 Archives.
We might as well get this out of the way now: yes, I did pull one of the Bull Durham cards.
I know these have become a hit with many collectors, but, as I just mentioned in a post the other day, Bull Durham has never been one of my favorite baseball films. It's been a while since I've seen it, and I honestly don't remember who this Bobby character even is in the first place.
I certainly wouldn't mind pulling a Nuke LaLoosh card, but the only one I'm after is Larry Hockett, played by Robert Wuhl who later starred in Arliss, one of the rare sports-centric TV shows I've actually enjoyed. Other than that, I don't really care.
Now, if Topps wants to make a Rookie of the Year insert set, I'll listen.
Topps selected a nice crop of past subsets to honor with inserts in 2016 Archives.
These "Father/Son" combos from '85 Topps prove that cardboard genealogy is always a fun ride.
Also honoring '85 Topps are those "#1 Draft Pick" inserts, which added a new zero-year card to my collection with the Hamilton.
My favorite of the inserts I've seen thus far have to be the '69 Topps Supers, which throws it back to an oddball set you almost never see recognized anywhere these days.
Better yet, I can fit these current, standard-sized Supers into a standard nine-pocket page.
But I'm not buying Archives for the inserts.
The base set is where the heart of this product lies. I had kind of a delayed love for last year's Archives which didn't fully hit me until months after the set had been live. I thought there were glimpses of greatness in the 2015 edition, but still room for untapped potential, which was why I was so much looking forward to the 2016 release.
One of my first pulls was this Kyle Schwarber, which instantly triggered the Great, now I won't have to overpay for it since I live in Chicago reaction.
I was able to devote all of my attention to the base cards after that.
The first set honored in 2016 Archives is 1953 Topps.
These are fairly well done -- and kudos to Topps for once again including Jim Abbott in a current product -- but I just can't get too excited about them. I think that's a combination of Topps already honoring '53 Topps time and time again in the past, and the fact that, as far as vintage goes, I've really never been that big of a fan of '53 Topps in the first place.
Pulling that Satchel Paige made me feel a tad better about the fact that I'll probably never own his real '53 Topps rookie card.
Though 1979 Topps came in at just #47 in my All-Time Topps Countdown, this year's Archives is making me reconsider pegging the set that low.
I thought the '79s were extremely well-done here, and I'm now I'm left to wonder whether there's some hidden greatness in '79 Topps that I'm only now discovering.
People might solely concern themselves with the hits and whatnot, but that, I think, should really be the goal of a set like Archives: to get you to dig deeper into the history of Topps, to recognize something you may have missed the first time around.
Sidebar: full career stats are back!
For whatever reason, Topps has truncated stat lines in the last couple years of Archives. (Random example: Robin Yount's 2015 Archives card only lists his numbers from 1974-89 despite the fact that he played until 1993.)
Now we get the full, star-studded stats for legends like Wade Boggs, which is no small matter for cardboard purists such as myself.
To me, 2016 Archives really hit its stride with the 1991 subset.
In this case, "hitting its stride" really means Oh my God I am falling in love with these things and I can't stop gushing, more or less. I've always had a deep appreciation for '91 Topps, and, at #13 in my countdown, it's my favorite Topps set of the last thirty years.
There are a few reasons why I think Topps absolutely knocked it out of the park with the '91s in this year's Archives:
1) I don't ever remember seeing 1991 Topps honored before this. It's one of those sets that often gets lumped in with the common apathy regarding overproduction-era cardboard, unfairly so.
2) Topps truly captured the spirit of the '91 checklist with photos like these. The photos -- like the '79 subset -- are largely made up of full body shots that really stand out amongst the zoomed-in, let's-see-what-we-can-find-up-this-guy's-nostrils face shots that riddle most of Flagship these days.
3) Many of the photos Topps used for the old timers are ones that were new to me, and I'm especially fond of the sight of Gaylord Perry in those Bloody Mary Indians duds from the '70s.
4) HOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I could be wrong, but, despite the fact that I've been collecting the guy for about a decade now, this might be the first time I've actually pulled a Hoyt Wilhelm from a pack of baseball cards. I'm pretty sure I've accumulated everything I currently own of him through purchases and trades.
Hoyt's 2016 Archives card uses a photo I've seen before, but it's a beautiful one: the legend himself showcasing the knuckleball grip that eventually sent him to Cooperstown, looking up beneath a dusky sky.
I've said many times that buying packs isn't a smart investment, that it's so much cheaper to just go ahead and buy the singles you want online or at a card show. And that's most definitely true.
Still, given how much I love 2016 Archives, there's not going to be much stopping me from walking through those motion-sensored doors of my local Target in the upcoming months and walking out with a fresh pack of cards.
Monday, June 6, 2016
The dime box frankenset, Page 15: Numbers 127-135
Let's take a look at how last week's voting played out.
Win -- 1978 Topps #125 George Scott (7 votes)
Place -- 1994 Upper Deck #124 Eduardo Perez (5 votes)
Show -- 1991 Studio #126 Jeff Kunkel (4 votes)
Last week's votes were, once again, pretty well spread out (mine went to the Brett Butler double dip), though a late surge pushed Boomer Scott over the top. His seven tallies out of the 28 total were enough to take the crown.
Today's cards can have their Gatorade baths and action photos, but sometimes good old vintage just can't be topped.
This week's page is probably one of my all-around personal favorites in my frankenset binder.
Let's meet the next nine nominees.
1999 Stadium Club #127 Brady Anderson
Brady Anderson stomps across home plate to score the game-winning run in a September 12, 1998 contest against the Angels.
1992 Upper Deck Minors #128 Eric Christopherson
Behind the board for a minor league jam session.
2001 Stadium Club #129 Mark Johnson
Safe or out?
2013 Topps Opening Day #130 Chase Headley
Throwing it back to the McDonald's era in San Diego.
1999 Upper Deck #131 Scott Karl
A baseball card of a guy signing a baseball card, or as I call it: Cardboard Inception.
1994 Topps #132 Bret Barberie
People always give '95 Fleer crap, but Topps got up to some strange things in the mid '90s, too.
1973 Topps #133 Dave Roberts
Bask in the glory of '70s Padres jerseys (also, extra points for matching yellows with the Rookie Cup).
1996 Topps #134 Chris Gomez
Double dipping with what I'm pretty sure is a Robin Ventura cameo.
1993 Ted Williams #135 Jim Gilliam BB
We close with perhaps one of the better action shots ever featured on a baseball card.
The polls are now on the sidebar.
Happy voting!
Wednesday, June 1, 2016
Good news, bad news at the flea market
The good news is that flea market season is once again upon us here in suburban Illinois.
The bad news is that I'm not sure how often I'll be able to go. I work most Sundays now, so in order to attend, I have to wake up painfully early in the morning -- not easy for me since I'm basically the exact opposite of a morning person -- to slot in a few solid card-digging hours before the beginning of my shift.
I decided to brave those sleepy eyes one morning a few weeks ago in order to make my first flea market run of the season on what turned out to be an oddly windy and chilly day that probably required more than the light sweater I was wearing.
The weather may not have been ideal, but, all in all, this first flea market trip definitely turned out to be a convincing performance.
Bad news: my two regular vendors weren't in attendance on this particular day, which left me worried that my lack of sleep and chattering teeth would go for naught.
Good news: a new card guy materialized in one of the first aisles.
His selection was composed of all sports, and I could tell from the scattered setup of his material that he was the kind of "little of everything" vendor I love.
Bad news: nothing at his table was priced, which, as most collectors will tell you, can be a big red flag when dealing with a new card vendor.
I was finding some good stuff during my initial run through his boxes, but that thought of maybe he'll want like 50 dollars for all this stuck in the back of my mind.
I couldn't let myself get too excited, which is pretty much the narrative when it comes to unpriced cards.
Good news: everything turned out to be extremely affordable.
I actually made two separate trips to this guy after he quoted me just four bucks on a stack of at least 50 cards during my initial dig through his material. I spent about ten dollars combined between both of my visits to his table.
That's a heck of a deal when you consider part of my finds involved inserts of Hall of Famers like Maddux and The Mick.
Most of the guy's selection consisted of late '70s and early '80s Topps commons.
I don't need a whole lot more of those these days, but I did manage to find a few that'd slipped through my fingers all these years.
I know I have that classic John Pacella somewhere -- I remember being fascinated by it as a young collector -- but, since the chances of finding it amongst the rubble of boxes in my room aren't good, I decided to just pull the trigger on a new copy.
The Schmidt is (was) a Dime Box Dozen need, which is an ultimate score when it comes to discount bin digging.
I found this in a box of miscellaneous oddball items in a faraway corner of the table, both sport and non-sport.
I'm sure Ian Desmond and Jesus Guzman are fine men, but you know Vlad was the reason I bought this Heritage box-topper.
Another fun development from this guy's selection was the stash of unopened packs he had off to the side.
Most were the most overproduced of the overproduction era -- think 1990 Donruss, 1991 Score, etc. But I did manage to unearth a couple packs of 1993 Pacific and 2002 Donruss Estrellas, two sets you don't see too often.
Bad news: I didn't pull the '93 Pacific Dale Murphy that's been sitting on my Dime Box Dozen list for what seems like an eternity now.
Good news: the pack did add a new notch to my John Olerud collection.
After the unopened packs came the boxed sets, and, specifically, this 50-card 1995 Stadium Club "Members Only" boxed set.
I like the trippy design, and I certainly got enough bang for my buck with all the star power here.
Mother's Cookies cards don't often make their way to the Midwest, which is what made this 1985 Astros set such an exciting find.
I absolutely adore these things, but I probably own less than a dozen Mother's singles combined because of how rare they are around here. This is probably one of the better sets out there because of the Technicolor Astros jerseys and the Astrodome backdrop.
Bad news: the 25-card set was missing the biggest star of them all -- Nolan Ryan -- but I couldn't much complain with the other 24 'stros I added to my collection.
My favorite batch of finds from this guy's table was probably this page of Starting Lineup oddballs.
These are also extremely difficult to track down, and they always seem to be overpriced when I do find them. Everything here, however, came out to just about a dime per, which, as you can see with the names featured here, is a surefire score.
All I can say is I hope New Card Guy is around during my future flea market runs.
Good news: I decided this Ron Santo oddball was worth the two-dollar price tag when I found it in a vendor's box of miscellany about midway through the flea market.
Bad news: I have absolutely no idea what it is, and I don't think it's likely I'll find out anytime soon.
Though my two main vendors weren't in attendance, one other semi-regular card guy was present during this recent flea market run.
I got to know him a bit during my trips last year, and he was the one responsible for one of the better card days I had last summer (or ever, for that matter). The prices of his cards vary from trip to trip, but, as I walked up to his table, he happily informed me that anything in his boxes was 10 for a buck.
You don't have to tell me twice.
I've wanted the Ichiro/Pujols card I just showed for a while, and these two definitely weren't bad for a dime each.
Hard to go wrong with a Diamond King Bench and a rookie of a 500-HR guy at that price.
Good news: I've enjoyed the blue parallels that Wal-Mart has issued in recent incarnations of Flagship.
Bad news: I'd much rather have these long-gone midnight black beauties.
The big finds from this guy's dime boxes were the oddballs.
No matter the day or the vendor, I always seem to come home with a stack of new oddities for my binders after every flea market run.
But I think this was my favorite dime box oddball on this particular Sunday.
I can't say I enjoy Bull Durham and/or Field of Dreams as much as most baseball fans seem to (and I've never seen For Love of the Game all the way through), but I get a huge kick out of knowing that I now own a Kevin Costner baseball card.
I thought that would be the cap on the day's finds...
...until I moved onto the guy's glass case and saw Roberto Clemente staring back at me.
It was priced at $15, which I thought was fair considering the immaculate shape this card is in. Still, although I really don't often like to haggle, something told me I might be able to get the price even lower.
I asked the guy if he'd take $15 for the Clemente and the stack of about 80 dime cards I had in my hand, and, wouldn't you know it...he accepted.
I'd try to continue the good news/bad news theme again here, but it really doesn't apply: adding an authentic Topps Roberto Clemente to my collection -- especially at such an affordable price -- is always, always good news.
And, just like that, flea market season is underway.
Monday, May 30, 2016
The dime box frankenset, Page 14: Numbers 118-126
We had another tight race last week.
Win -- 1995 Topps #110 Walt Weiss (5 votes)
Place (tie) -- 1993 Upper Deck #111 Brady Anderson, 2015 Topps Update #US-115 Stephen Vogt, 1993 Upper Deck #117 Lance Parrish (4 votes each)
Show (tie) -- 1999 Stadium Club #112 Chan Ho Park, 1983 Fleer #116 Dennis Leonard (3 votes each)
These might be the most spread-out results I can remember, because it usually takes more than five votes to take a frankenset crown. We very nearly had a four-way tie for first before a late tally pushed the double-dipping Walt Weiss over the top.
I personally had my hat in the Lance Parrish ring, but I don't have any real qualms about the winner here.
We're back with a fresh page of nine new hopefuls.
I have a feeling it'll be another close one this week, so, without further ado, let's meet the nominees.
1998 Fleer Tradition #118 Rico Brogna
A nod to the Negro League's Philadelphia Stars.
1990 Upper Deck #119 Brett Butler
Eagerly awaiting the results at first (with a Roberto Alomar cameo).
2016 Topps #120 Alcides Escobar WS
One of the more exciting World Series moments of my lifetime.
1998 Fleer Tradition #121 Jay Bell
Family matters at the ballpark.
1994 Upper Deck #122 Jose Vizcaino
Sending an infielder head-over-heels.
2016 Topps Opening Day #OD-123 Johnny Giavotella
Postgame Gatorade showers are quickly becoming a fixture on cards these days, and I'm completely fine with that.
1994 Upper Deck #124 Eduardo Perez
Don't think he much agreed with that call.
1978 Topps #125 George Scott
All smiles by the batting cage.
1991 Studio #126 Jeff Kunkel
We close with some serious bubble trouble in Studio form.
The polls are now on the sidebar.
Happy voting!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)































































