tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5342310663064800554.post4537281491840424363..comments2024-03-24T13:24:23.142-05:00Comments on Dime Boxes -- The Low-End Baseball Card Collector's Journey: Bowman vs. Topps: The early yearsNickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13508921644099472101noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5342310663064800554.post-8688464021479195362013-02-19T16:16:57.805-06:002013-02-19T16:16:57.805-06:00To me the worse sets of the 50s is 1955 Bowman fol...To me the worse sets of the 50s is 1955 Bowman followed by 52 Topps so we don't agree much there. <br /><br />53 is my favorite though so at least we agree there.<br /><br />Love the 54 Preacher you posted. Search my blog for Preacher and you will see why.AdamEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12107347958456472504noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5342310663064800554.post-11260730970441337452013-02-19T10:50:28.355-06:002013-02-19T10:50:28.355-06:00I was nodding my head, "yes," in agreeme...I was nodding my head, "yes," in agreement.<br /><br />Then I got to the '54 Topps. <br /><br />Then I paused. <br /><br />And stared. <br /><br />I'd still be staring, but I had to let you know I'm staring at that '54 Topps of yours. Ha! But, that '55 Bowman is a stellar piece, no doubt. <br /><br />Anyway, previously (that's to say, last week) my oldest cards were two from the 1959 Ted Williams set. All that's changed. I just picked up a fairly destroyed '55 Topps Aaron I can't wait to show off, just as soon as it arrives. <br /><br />No Bowman's of the vintage variety here in Underdogville. Not yet. You've made the case. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com